I believe Mr. Joy is correct in his pessimism. Our society is rushing to embrace technologies of which we have little understanding concerning their ultimate impact. Information and technology are developing at an exponential pace. Our wisdom regarding them is not. Disasters like Chernobyl are inevitable. When they happen with GNR the results could be disastrous to the point of unprecedented destruction. Combine them with the already mature technologies of nuclear weapons, chemical and biological warfare and intercontinental ballistic missiles and we are way over our heads.
Your email address will not be published. It is well-deserved that we marvel, celebrate, and appreciate how these advancements are adding or contributing to our experience of life as human beings. The overthrow of the human species by machines is by no means inevitable.
It will not happen overnight. There would necessarily be stages that we as a species would be witness to. Initially, there would be a state of reasonable reliance on machines to augment our thinking, in advance of relegating it excessively and detrimentally to them. Conceivably upon encountering a situation which goes too far, potentially threatening our existence or relevance, we could intervene.
Among the most salient considerations:. There is no doubt that innovation is part of our nature as human beings. Invariably we should, must, and will continue to build and ascend into the acquisition of new capabilities. For our society and the well-being of our species, this has shown that it can be a very good thing. We have reached a challenging point, however, and it is vital that we start thinking considerately, and perhaps differently, about our approach to innovation.
The need to take other factors into account when selecting where to focus our innovative capacities is increasingly urgent. The key feature, which empowers NGR technologies with its enormous destructive force, is self-replication Joy, , p.
Being able to replicate itself, the product of nanotechnology, genetics, or robotics becomes an independent entity; therefore, humanity loses control over it. This organism or system becomes free in terms of spreading, mutation, and interaction with other species. This can lead to the physical damage and total extermination of any living entity.
As the main objective of genetics and robotics is the creation of improved species, humanity faces the danger of annihilation in case of their success. It is a primary evolutional law that superior species survive, whereas less perfect die in a confrontation with them Joy, , p.
Working on the generation of perfect machines and organisms, people are pursuing an extremely dangerous dream of being a creator of life. However, they create something that can destroy them if it gets out of control. Joy gives two discouraging scenarios of what might happen in regards to overtaking the control. In case people retain control over the situation, there will emerge the privileged group, which will destroy the freedom of common people by controlling their lives with the help of new technologies.
None of these scenarios is desirable for the future. Nevertheless, they seem realistic, therefore, very disturbing. It is crucial to point out that provided forecasts belong to Theodore Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber.
Even though Bill Joy condemns him as a criminal and does not justify or forgive his acts, he accepts his concerns , p. The fact that the author examines different ideas on the issue without giving moral evaluation to its creators proves his credibility. The confessional manner in which the article is written also confirms his impartiality. Customer support is perfect, any time you ask any question, you get an instant response.
I do love Exclusive Paper! Emma H. You may read our privacy policy for more info. Warning: If you try using the HL in an unethical manner, expect to fail your class. All HL items are old, recycled materials and are therefore not original. We intend them to be used only for the purpose of studying and learning. They will be ignored! Close Submit. Question In "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us" Bill Joy expresses a powerful pessimism about the dangers of technologies that may be developed later in our century.
What are Joy's best reasons for being pessimistic? What are his strongest reasons for expressing optimism?
0コメント